Money Grubbing Whores
Last night I was having a chat conversation with a friend of mine regarding the stereotypical roles that women and men fall into. Namely, society furthering the emasculation of men and giving that power to the women. Why? Apparently because there is a large percentage of women that believe that they have something magical between their legs that entitles them to pretty much do whatever they want and have the men pay for it all.
But, it's not just the women's fault. As men, we have allowed this to happen. We fully allow women to take this role and allow ourselves to be subjugated to their rules. But here is the best part. These are the same women that can't figure out why their husband dumps them for a new materialistic-money-grubbing-whore when their face and body don't match up to the standards that materialistic-money-grubbing-whores must sustain.
Talk about a viscous circle!!! And, of course I realize that not ALL women are like this, nor are ALL men like this. My friend says she just doesn't see many women like that whereas I seem to find them all the time. I'm willing to be a lot of my male friends would agree.
The best part? Her and I are chatting about this and my roommate is telling my other roommate how he got a ride home from a hot chick that was a runner-up in the Mrs. Montana pageant. The kicker was that she was asking him what he drove and what he did for a living before she even got to know him. Typical....
3 comments:
So, I've had a couple of revalations in the last couple of years: #1 Finding a 30's, single, level headed gal, somewhat pretty with no kids is practically impossible. #2 Finding a 30's, single, level headed GUY, somewhat goodlooking with no kids is practically impossible, too. SO, if you're #1 or #2, then you're highly sought after, and you'll have to beat them off with a stick. Experience tells me this. So the real question is, are you #1 or #2, and if not, why not?
You know, my esteem is not that low on the totem pole. But based on your post I'd have to logicaly conclude that I am neither #1 (obviously) or #2.
Gee, thanks for ruining my morning.
A follow on:
Fem Number: a fictional value at which a woman will assign herself to any given male.
Fem equation (emperically derived)
Vfem = (Mg + Lg + 20Pg)/Afem
Where Mg is the monetary worth of the guy, ie how much money can he can spend on a girl or things to accessorize a girl, like cars and jewelry
And Lg is the physical attractiveness of the male. The exact value is dependent upon the female, but this is an interpolated value between stunning handsome and 3 coyote ugly.
And Pg is the charm and personality of the guy. This is a negligable value and normally ignored.
Finally, Afem is the attractiveness of the female based her own perception of attractiveness. NOTE: this does not nomally correspond to reality.
Using this value, the average female will evaluate each male she meets until she arrives at an assement of his value, ie "what kind of car do you drive, what do you do for a living?".
Any male with a Vfem above the current female requirement will be pursued. if a female is already occupied, then the required Fem number is simply increased until to a level high enough to initiate movement to a new male.
Bling!
Sorry Girls, it's the truth. Really I am.
Post a Comment